Score a thousand applicants against the intake.
The Applicant Quick Search & Score Function reads every applicant on a requisition, scores each one against what the hiring manager actually asked for, and hands back a ranked shortlist.
Book 15 minutes →A thousand people applied. Somebody has to read all of them.
That somebody is a recruiter, and it is most of their week. Open the requisition, work the pile, reject or advance to prescreen. Then do it again on the next req.
What goes in.
Hiring manager intake notes
Submitted once per requisition and reused for every applicant on it.
The job description
The formal requirements every candidate has to clear.
The requisition #
Pick the req in Greenhouse, Workday, Taleo or wherever the pile sits.
What comes back.
Why it works.
The bar stops moving
Applicant one and applicant nine hundred are read against the same intake, with the same weighting.
A written reason, either way
Every score carries the evidence line that produced it. That is what survives someone asking why.
Nothing auto-rejects
The tool ranks and reasons. A person dispositions. The recruiter can argue with any row.
Questions.
Does it work with our ATS?
It is built against your ATS API. Greenhouse, Workday, Taleo, Bullhorn, Lever and others. Applicants are read where they already sit and dispositions are written back, so there is no second system to keep in sync.
Is this auto-rejection?
No. The tool produces a ranked list with reasoning. A recruiter dispositions in the ATS. Every candidate has a written reason attached whether they advance or not, which is the opposite of an unexplained bulk reject.
How is it priced?
A fixed-fee integration engagement, sized by applicant volume, requisition count and the systems it has to talk to. Not a per-seat subscription. Scope it on a 15 minute call.
Ready to see it against one of your requisitions?
Book 15 minutes →Or call Wendy, the AI assistant here, on 1 833 442 7540, or email info@paulalfred.ai